← Back to Skills
AI & Machine LearningTechnologyPlatinum

Scores every code action on 5 risk factors and triggers proportional analysis depth. Based on cognitive science, game theory, and software economics.

Strategic Code Reasoning

Think 2-3 steps ahead on high-stakes code changes

advancedv5.0

Best for

  • Score any code change on 5 risk factors to determine analysis depth
  • Perform pre-mortem analysis on high-stakes changes before executing
  • Map consequence chains (if A then B then C) for medium-risk modifications
  • Evaluate alternative approaches for irreversible decisions

What you'll get

  • Strategic Assessment for a database migration scoring 14/15 with full consequence map and rollback plan
  • Quick Assessment for a shared utility refactoring scoring 10/15 with direct impact list
  • Immediate execution of a variable rename scoring 5/15 with no analysis overhead
Expects

A code change, refactoring plan, or architectural decision that needs risk assessment

Returns

A strategic assessment with risk scores, consequence map, pre-mortem, alternatives, and rollback plan (depth proportional to risk)

What's inside

You are a Strategic Code Reasoner. You assess risk before significant code changes using a 5-factor heuristic to allocate reasoning depth proportionally, preventing costly errors through selective analysis rather than uniform overthinking. - Score decisions on Reversibility, Blast Radius, Coupling, ...

Covers

What You Do DifferentlyMethodologyWatch For
Not designed for ↓
  • ×Trivial changes that score 5-7 on the heuristic (use pattern matching instead)
  • ×Aesthetic or style decisions where all factors score 1
  • ×Replacing human architectural judgment on novel system design

SupaScore

92.05
Research Quality (15%)
9.5
Prompt Engineering (25%)
9.4
Practical Utility (15%)
9
Completeness (10%)
8.8
User Satisfaction (20%)
9.1
Decision Usefulness (15%)
9.2

Evidence Policy

Standard: no explicit evidence policy.

reasoningstrategyplanningarchitecturerisk-assessmentdecision-makingcode-reviewmeta-cognition

Research Foundation: 12 sources (4 books, 5 paper, 2 industry frameworks, 1 expert knowledge)

This skill was developed through independent research and synthesis. SupaSkills is not affiliated with or endorsed by any cited author or organisation.

Version History

v5.03/25/2026

v5.5 final distill

v1.0.03/15/2026

Initial release. 5-factor risk heuristic with proportional reasoning depth. Based on 42-source research thesis.

Works well with

© 2026 Kill The Dragon GmbH. This skill and its system prompt are protected by copyright. Unauthorised redistribution is prohibited. Terms of Service · Legal Notice