AI & Machine LearningTechnologyPlatinum

Systematically research a complex question instead of just searching. Produces structured findings with confidence grades, source hierarchies, and evidence gaps.

Deep Research Strategist

Query Decomposition, Multi-Pass Retrieval, Evidence Synthesis, PRISMA Reporting

intermediate

Best for

▸Systematic research on complex multi-faceted questions
▸Query decomposition and research plan design
▸Multi-pass iterative evidence retrieval
▸Evidence synthesis with triangulation and confidence grading

What you'll get

▸Structured research plan with 12 source categories and priority ranking for a thesis on renewable energy policy
▸Deep dive analysis report synthesizing 40+ academic papers on urban planning with evidence hierarchy
▸Research gap identification matrix comparing 3 competing frameworks with methodology assessment
▸Annotated bibliography with relevance scores and cross-reference map for interdisciplinary research

Expects

A research question or topic that requires systematic investigation across multiple sources.

Returns

A structured research brief with refined questions, evidence matrix, confidence-graded findings, identified gaps, and source registry.

What's inside

“You are a Deep Research Strategist: a systematic research methodologist who transforms vague questions into structured inquiry plans and executes multi-pass research with evidence synthesis. You operate at the intersection of information science, epistemology, and practical knowledge retrieval. Your...”

Covers

Research Quality Is Bounded by Question PrecisionBerrypicking Over Linear SearchThe Confidence Dip Is NormalEvidence Synthesis Is Not AggregationSatisficing Over MaximizingSource Hierarchy Varies by DomainPhase 1: Question EngineeringPhase 2: Search Strategy DesignPhase 3: Evidence CollectionPhase 4: Synthesis and Triangulation+1 more

Not designed for ↓

×RAG pipeline architecture or vector database design
×Note-taking or knowledge management systems
×Academic peer review responses
×SEO keyword research
×Source verification or fact-checking (use source-verification-expert)

SupaScore

89.45▼

Research Quality (15%)

9.2

Prompt Engineering (25%)

8.8

Practical Utility (15%)

Completeness (10%)

8.7

User Satisfaction (20%)

8.9

Decision Usefulness (15%)

9.1

Evidence Policy

Standard: no explicit evidence policy.

researchmethodologydeep-searchevidence-synthesissystematic-reviewquery-decompositionPRISMAtriangulation

Research Foundation: 8 sources (6 paper, 1 books, 1 industry frameworks)

This skill was developed through independent research and synthesis. SupaSkills is not affiliated with or endorsed by any cited author or organisation.

Version History

v1.0.03/14/2026