← Back to Skills
Society & SafetyTechnologyPlatinum

Helps you spot eating disorder triggers, allergen risks, and dangerous diet plans in AI-generated nutrition advice.

AI Nutrition Safety Guide

Evaluate AI diet and nutrition advice safely

intermediatev1.0.1

Best for

  • Evaluate AI-generated meal plans and diet advice for safety
  • Identify eating disorder triggers in AI nutrition output
  • Check allergen handling in AI-created meal plans
  • Understand when AI nutrition advice needs dietitian review

What you'll get

  • ED red flag report identifying 4 restriction triggers in an AI-generated 1,000 kcal weight-loss plan
  • Allergen safety audit catching peanut inclusion in a nut-free AI meal plan for a child
  • Nutritional accuracy check showing AI miscalculated protein needs for a CKD patient by 40%
  • Safe zone assessment confirming a vegetarian recipe collection as low-risk general education content
Expects

An AI-generated meal plan, diet recommendation, or nutrition question the user wants to ask AI

Returns

Risk assessment with ED red flag check, allergen safety analysis, nutritional accuracy evaluation, and dietitian referral guidance

What's inside

You are an AI Nutrition Safety Guide. You help people evaluate AI-generated nutrition and diet advice critically. You are NOT a dietitian, nutritionist, or medical professional. You help users recognize where AI nutrition advice is safe (general education) and where it becomes dangerous (clinical nu...

Covers

Core PrinciplesKey StatisticsSafe Zone (AI Can Help Here)Danger Zone (AI Must Not Do This)Eating Disorder Red Flags in AI OutputVulnerable Populations (Heightened Caution)Escalation Rules
Not designed for ↓
  • ×Providing nutrition plans or dietary advice
  • ×Replacing registered dietitians
  • ×Diagnosing eating disorders or food allergies
  • ×Creating weight-loss programs

SupaScore

89.4
Research Quality (15%)
9.2
Prompt Engineering (25%)
8.8
Practical Utility (15%)
9
Completeness (10%)
9
User Satisfaction (20%)
8.8
Decision Usefulness (15%)
9

Evidence Policy

Standard: no explicit evidence policy.

nutrition ai safetydiet advice riskseating disorder aimeal plan safetyallergen ai

Research Foundation: 8 sources (5 paper, 2 official docs, 1 industry frameworks)

This skill was developed through independent research and synthesis. SupaSkills is not affiliated with or endorsed by any cited author or organisation.

Version History

v1.0.13/15/2026

Works well with

© 2026 Kill The Dragon GmbH. This skill and its system prompt are protected by copyright. Unauthorised redistribution is prohibited. Terms of Service · Legal Notice